← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65484/2025allowed

Firoz @ Md. Firoj v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-24Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65484 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2025 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Firoz @ Md. Firoj Son of Moti Kuraisi Resident of village - Rampur Khurd, P.S.- Pupri, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ayush Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in para 7 of the bail petition during the course of the day.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

3. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 201 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section

4. As per prosecution case, 16.200 litre Nepali liquor was recovered from the motorcycle in question.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name has been transpired in the present case as owner of the motorcycle in question. Petitioner has given his motorcycle to Md. Meraj for medical emergency and he has misused the said motorcycle. Petitioner has no concern with the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65484 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 alleged recovered liquor. Petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of BNSS. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

6. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-02, Sitamarhi in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 201 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/- U T