← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74133/2018dismissed

Ranjit Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-01-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.74133 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year- Thana- District- ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar Son of Rajendra Prasad, resident of Village- Bhikhani Bigha, Police Station- Sare, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State Of Bihar and Anr

2. The District Manager, Bihar State Food Corporation, District Nalanda. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the BSFC :

Mr. Shailendra Kr.Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2019 Heard the parties.

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was disposed of vide order dated 30.7.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.38067 of 2018 with direction to the petitioner to surrender within a period of six weeks along the bank guarantee of Rs.01 crore, which has been deposited in the learned court below and if so deposited the petitioner shall be released on bail and the petitioner was given protection that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

Now after almost six months, the petitioner has moved for modification of the order stating that he is unable to get the bank guarantee of such amount deposited as such he may be permitted to give land of the family members as the bank

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74133 of 2018(3) dt.16-01-2019 2/2 guarantee.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to modify the order earlier passed by this Court and it is also made clear that if the petitioner does not deposit the bank guarantee within a period of one month, the protection granted earlier allowed to the petitioner shall have no effect.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U