Punam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16727 of 2022 ====================================================== Punam Kumari Wife of Sri Dinesh Kumar Chaupal, Resident of Ward no. 11, Village Kochgama, P.O.- Gokhlapur, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, I.C.D.S., Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea Division Purnea. 4.

The District Magistrate, Araria.

5.

The District Programme Officer, Araria.

6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Narpatganj, District- Araria. 7.

The Ladies Supervisor (Mahila Prayavbekshika) Child Development Project, Narpatganj, District- Araria.

8.

Sangita Kumari wife of Shri Binod Kumar Mukhia, resident of Ward No. 10, Village- Gokhulapur, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Sagar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha ( GA- 7 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for issuance of appropriate writ(s)/ direction/ direction(s) for quashing the order dated 17.10.2022 passed and issued by the Respondent no.3 so far it relates to the petitioner by which selection/appointment of the petitioner as Anganwari Sevika (Ward no.11) has been cancelled and further for commanding the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue as

Patna High Court CWJC No.16727 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2024 2/2 Anganwari Sevika at Ward no.11, Gokhulapur, Narpatganj, Araria alongwith all consequential reliefs/benefits."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U