← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15502/2023disposed

Shambhu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-04Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15502 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Shambhu Paswan S/o Ramnaresh Paswan, R/o Vill-Manik Bigha, Panchayat-Belchi, Post-Gosaimath, P.S.-Chandi, District-Nalanda, Pin803110, Bihar. 2.

Shravan Paswan, S/o Prakash Paswan, R/o Rahui, Bhangan Bigha, P.S. Chandi, District-Nalanda, Pin-803118, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Education Officer, Motihari, Distt.-East Champaran. 5.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, East Champaran, Motihari. 6.

The Block Education Officer, Ramgarhwa, Distt.-East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Shukla For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madan Jeet Kumar ( Gp 20 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is fully covered by the judgment passed by this Court in L.P.A. No.1254 of 2016 dated 28.08.2023 and other analogous cases. He further submits that some co-ordinate Bench of this Court has also passed judgment in the case of others and the petitioner's case stands on similar footing. 3.

In view of fair submission made by learned counsel for

Patna High Court CWJC No.15502 of 2023(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 the petitioner, in my view, no useful purpose would be served keeping this writ application pending.

4.

Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a detailed representation before the District Programme Officer Establishment, Motihari, respondent no.5, along with the judgment aforesaid and other documents in support of his claim. The District Programme Officer Establishment, Motihari (respondent no.5) is well advised to consider the case of the petitioners and dispose of the representation of the petitioners after affording an opportunity of personal hearing or through their counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order within eight weeks from the date of its receipt.

5.

It is made clear that respondent District Programme Officer Establishment, Motihari (respondent no.5) shall be personally held responsible for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U