Jamil Akbar @ Jamil Akhtar @ Md. Jamil v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70087 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Jamil Akbar @ Jamil Akhtar @ Md. Jamil S/o Late Nasruddin Miyan Resident of Village- Amir Khan Tola, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Sugauli, DistrictEast Champaran. 2.

Ijhar Alam @ Ijhar Babu @ Izhaar Babu S/o Moharram Miyan @ Md. Moharram Resident of Village- Amir Khan Tola, Ward No.-12, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhurendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 447, 307, 354, 354(B), 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that the accused persons including the petitioners came and on orders of Joni Miya, petitioner no. 1 assaulted the informant by dabiya causing injury on head, while petitioner no. 2 assaulted Roshan by gandasa causing injury on head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70087 of 2024(3) dt.18-12-2024 2/2 the informant who is mother-in-law of the sister of the petitioner no. 2. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, which amply demonstrates that petitioners never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 178 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T