Lalu Yadav @ Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72320 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2023 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- Munger ====================================================== 1.

Lalu Yadav @ Ajit Kumar 2.

Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Yadav Both Sons of Ashok Yadav @ Saukhi Yadav, resident of Village- Raniya, PSTetiya Bamber, Dist- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Shashi Saurabh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 26-11-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners in this application pray for bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Sangrampur (Tetiya Bamber O.P.) P.S. Case no.315 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the five named accused persons including the petitioners herein are said to have come variously armed and of having assaulted the son of the informant leading to serious injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. As

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72320 of 2024(3) dt.26-11-2024 2/2 against the allegation of assault by three accused persons, the corresponding injuries have not been found. The petitioners are students and have no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that even the application for regular bail of co-accused Ashok Yadav has been rejected vide order dated 18.4.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. no.6845 of 2024.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioners in the FIR, corresponding injuries having been found to be grievous in nature caused by hard and blunt substance and which is said to be life threatening together with the regular bail application of co-accused having been rejected vide aforesaid order, the Court is not inclined to allow the application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the learned Court below within a period of four weeks. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T