Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30887/2017rejected

Sonu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-13Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30887 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2017 Thana -DARAUNDHA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Sonu Sharma, Son of Jitendra Sharma, Resident of Village- Sherpur, P.S.- Daraunda, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2017 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 71 of 2017, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 151, 152 and 153 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan.

The accusation is that informant being the Officer-inCharge of Daraunda Police Station on receiving informant about death of a person in vehicle accident, he along with other Police personnel reached there and saw that mob indulged in raising slogans against administration. When informant tried to pacify the dispute, at that time, this petitioner caused injury at him through Farsa. The members of the mob also caused injury to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30887 of 2017 (4) dt.13-09-2017 2/2 other Police officials.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation has been made against the petitioner to cause injury to the informant, who is Officer-in-Charge of Dauranda Police Station, but the injury was found simple in nature. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trail Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T