Talewar Baitha v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76955 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-443 Year-2016 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Talewar Baitha, S/o Late Upendra Baitha Resident of Village- Bangraha, P.S. Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar, 2.

Rangeela Devi, W/o Talewar Baitha Resident of Village- Bangraha, P.S. Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi A/p- D/o Chulhai Baitha, Resident of VillageKoily, P.S.- Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dinesh Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. C-1/443 of 2016, registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is of torturing of the complainant by her husband and other inlaws due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and removing her along with her child from matrimonial house after snatching her personal belongings. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, admittedly, the petitioner is the husband of complainant/O.P. No.2 and he is still ready to keep the O.P. No.2 with full

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76955 of 2018(4) dt.30-04-2019 2/2 dignity, but she does not want to live with the petitioner and after quarrel, she left her matrimonial house along with her baby.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. Pupri at Sitamarhi in connection with C-1/443/2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T