Prem Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70992 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1690 Year-2015 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== 1.

Prem Ranjan Son Of Late Ashok Kumar Mishra Resident Of Village - Mau, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya 2.

Ram Swareth Sharma Son Of Late Bhagwan Sharma Resident Of Village - Mau, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya 3.

Rakesh Ranjan @ Rajesh Ranjan Son Of Late Ashok Kumar Mishra Resident Of Village - Mau, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Rewati Kant Pathak Son Of Yugal Kishore Pathak Resident Of Village - Mau, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Srivastava, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Bibhuti Narayan, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP For the Opp. Party no. 2 Mr. Devendra Kr. Pandey, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they fraudulently transfer of property with conspiracy by preparing fake document.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70992 of 2023(2) dt.29-11-2023 2/2 this case. He submits that the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 are purchaser and petitioner no. 2 is the witness on the registered sale deed. He submits that the partition suit between the parties is pending before the learned court below. He submits that the present dispute is purely civil in nature. He further submits that petitioners have criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 oppose the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1690 of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T