Patna High CourtCWJC/289/2014dismissed

Suman Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-03Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.289 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Suman Kumar Sinha Son Of Late Bishwambhar Prasad Sinha Resident Of Ward No.12, Gudri Bazar, P.O. + District - Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Programme And Development, Bihar

3. The Principal Secretary, Aapda Management Department, Patna, Bihar

4. The Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa

5. The Project Director, Bihar Aapda Punarwas Evam Punarnirman Society At 430, 4th Floor, Vishwasaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna - 800015, Bihar

6. Assistant Project Director, Bihar Aapda Punarwas Evam Punarnirman Society At 430, 4th Floor, Vishwasaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna - 800015, Bihar

7. Additional Development Commissioner, Saharsa, Bihar

8. Additional Development Commissioner, Madhepura, Bihar

9. Additional Development Commissioner, Supaul, Bihar

10. District Magistrate, Saharsa, Bihar

11. District Magistrate, Madhepura, Bihar

12. District Magistrate, Supaul, Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aditya Prakash Sahay For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Raisul Haque, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan & Nilanjan Chatterjee ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 03-02-2015 The engagement of the petitioner was contractual in nature. If the authority decided to terminate and bring it to an end on the basis of reconstitution of the organization of the Society,

Patna High Court CWJC No.289 of 2014 (4) dt.03-02-2015 2 / 2 which is now supposed to take charge of Koshi rehabilitation, then the petitioner cannot have grievance against such decision. If the removal of the petitioner falls foul with the contract, he has remedy available to him under common law.

The writ petition is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) B.Roy/- U