Raghuveer Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3200 of 2014 ======================================================
1. Raghuveer Paswan, son of Late Shiv Ratan Paswan .
2. Rajendra Prasad, son of Late Lakhan Sao.
3. Dinesh Prasad, Son of Late Kamla Prasad.
All are residents of Village - Bel, P.S. Obra and District - Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Land Reforms and Revenue, Bihar (Patna).
3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Minority.
4. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.
5. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.
6. The Sub Division Judicial Magistrate, Daud Nagar, Aurangabad.
7. The Circle Officer, Daudnagar, Aurangabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Ambashtha, AC to AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 29-01-2015 Heard Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Rakesh Ambashtha, learned Assisting Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.15 for the State.
The grievance of the petitioners is that a plot bearing no.2236 situate in Mauza- Bel, P.S.- Obra in the district of Aurangabad which is though recorded as 'Chiraree'
(Murdghatee) but the district authorities are trying to alter the usage of the same and are constructing a boundary wall around a
Patna High Court CWJC No.3200 of 2014 (4) dt.29-01-2015 part of the plot for being used as Kabristan. It is the case of the petitioners that plot of lands are already earmarked for Kabristan bearing plot nos.1144, 1145 and 1166 to 1169 in the said Mauza in the district of Aurangabad and thus the exercise is unsustainable.
Mr. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners after some arguments prays for disposal of the writ petition to enable the petitioners to take recourse to such other remedy that may be available to them in law for the redressal of their grievance.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U