Golu Kumar @ Harsh @ Gaul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34861 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -270 Year- 2017 Thana -BEGUSARAI TOWN District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Harsh @ Gaul Kumar Son of Late Pankaj Singh, R/o Village- Bishwanath Nagar, P.S.- Begusarai Town, in the DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-08-2017 The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 270 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b) A, 26, 35 of Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner and co-accused is that they are making planning for loot.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that nothing has been recovered from his possession and petitioner was accused in other case also but he is on bail. The petitioner has been in custody for more than two months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let petitioner above

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Begusarai P.S. Case No. 270 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not adduce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) If the active involvement of the petitioner in such type of cases is found in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) veena/- U T