Vikash Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70285 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2020 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== VIKASH SAH SON OF BUCHCHI SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGEAATAPUR NAKUNI, PS- HASANPUR, DIST- SAMASTIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar BIHAR 2.

RANJEET SONI SON OF LATE JANGALI SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AND POS- TETARI, PS- DANDARI, DIST- BEGUSARAI ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant, due to nonfulfillment of further dowry demand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. There is no any prior complaint

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70285 of 2023(2) dt.06-11-2023 2/2 regarding assaulting, harassment and torturing to the deceased against the petitioner and others. There is no eye-witness of the alleged occurrence, on the basis of suspicion, petitioner has been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that good sense has been prevailed between the parties. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 22.06.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateIvth, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 211 of 2020.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T