Putul Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69533 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2023 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Putul Chaudhary Son Of Karan Chaudhary Resident Of Village - Visthapit, Dayaram Nagar Dih, P.S. - Rajgir, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Atul Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 01-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No.133 of 2023, lodged on 08.03.2023, under Sections 341/323/307/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that the petitioner along with another accused have caused gunshot injury on the back of the informant's husband due to which he got injuries and subsequently died during treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge sheet has already been filed in this case. Petitioner is in custody since 13.03.2023 and he is ready to fulfill all the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69533 of 2023(2) dt.01-11-2023 2/2 conditions whatsoever shall be imposed by the Court. He submits that there are five criminal cases pending against the petitioner but petitioner has not disclosed in the petition whether he is on bail or not.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Counsel for the informant submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean. There are five criminal cases pending against him and in the FIR specific allegation against the petitioner is of gunshot. He submits that in the FIR there are two injuries alleged to have been caused and in the post mortem also two injuries were found on the back which fully support the statement of the fardbeyan.

6. In the present facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T