Jainendra Singh @ Jainendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72270 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Jainendra Singh @ Jainendra Kumar Singh Son of Surajdeo Singh Resident of Saligram Bhawan Bypass near over Bridge Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, Distt.- Aurangabad 2.

Meera Singh Wife of Jainendra Singh @ Jainendra Kumar Singh Resident of Saligram Bhawan Bypass near over Bridge Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, Distt.- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Nidhi Kumari Wife of Ravi Kant Kumar, D/O- Kamta Prasad Singh Resident of D-6, Laxmi Niwas, Vijay Nagar, Hanuman, P.S.- Kankarbag, Distt.- Patna, Mobile No. 7482935562 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Kumari Chandna, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehends their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 177, 203, 307, 323, 325, 339, 379, 420, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3.

Petitioners, who are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the opposite party no2., are said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of their family members over the dowry demand.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72270 of 2024(2) dt.29-10-2024 2/2 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and have committed no offence. Petitioners have neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Patna Mahila P.S. Case No.05 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T