Patna High CourtCWJC/8495/2013dismissed

Baidyanath Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-26Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8495 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Baidyanath Sharma Son Of Late Saryug Sharma Resident Of Village - Bhalua, P.S. - Barharia, District - Siwan At Present President Cum Land Donor Of The Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Inter College, Bhalua, P.S. Barharia, District - Siwan (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

2. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board Patna

3. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna (Bihar)

4. The District Magistrate, Siwan

5. The District Education Officer, Siwan

6. Sri Ram Autar Yadav Son Of Late Kishandeo Yadav Resident Of Village - Bhalua, P.S. - Barharia, District - Siwan .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. B.K. Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Utsav Kumar, AC to GA-4 For the Board : Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner claims that he is President of Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Inter College, Bhalua, P.S. Barharia, District-Siwan. The said College is privately managed institution, according to the petitioner.

3. This application has been filed seeking direction to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3,i.e., Bihar School Examination Board to treat Anand Kumar Sharma as Incharge Principal of the said College, who was duly appointed, according to him, by the

College Managing Committee and restrained one Ram Autar Yadav (Respondent No.6) to perform any function as Incharge Principal of the said College.

4. This application was filed in the year 2013. The dispute is apparently between the Members of the Managing Committee of the said College, i.e., between private parties. The dispute of this nature between the two private parties need not be gone into in writ jurisdiction.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U