← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3294/2018disposed

Dr. Manjula Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-09Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3294 of 2018 ====================================================== Dr. Manjula Kumari, aged about 52 years W/o Jyoti Kumar Verma Resident of Mohalla Boring Canal Road, P.S. Sri Krishnapuri, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department having his office at Vikash Bhawan, P.S. Shachivalaya, District- Patna.

2. The Director Secretary, Education Department having his office at Vikash Bhawan, P.S. Shachivalaya, District- Patna.

3. The District Education Officer, Patna having his Office at Patna.

4. The Regional Deputy Director, Education, Patna Division, No. 1, Budh Marg, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikas Mohan For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Binita Singh- SC28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 09-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Vide Annexure-18 the Regional Deputy Director Education has issued direction to the District Programme Officer (Establishment),Madhubani in connection with payment of arrears of salary to the petitioner but respondent District Programme Officer is sitting tight over the matter. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents cannot keep the matter pending. They have to decide the claim o and ensure payment of arrears expeditiously. Referring to Annexure-18 he submits that Regional Deputy

Patna High Court CWJC No.3294 of 2018(2) dt.09-03-2018 2/2 Director has issued direction that the District Programme Officer was required to carry direction.

Considering the contents of letter contained in memo no. 934 dated 24.08.2017 the court deem fit and proper to grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the Regional Deputy Director of the Education afresh alongwith a copy of this order and in case such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month, the respondent Regional Deputy Director is required to see that the order passed on 24.8.2017 is taken to its logical end.

Necessary decision in this regard may be taken by the respondent Regional Deputy Director within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U