← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/23082/2013dismissed

Raja Sah Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-04Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23082 of 2013 ====================================================== Raja Sah Construction Private Limited, Kamalnath Nagar, Bettiah, Through Its Managing Director, Rameshwar Prasad Son Of Shri Raja Sah Resident Of Kamalnath Nagar, Bettiah, Police Station- Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation Water Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Chief Engineer (North), Tube-Well, Muzaffarpur

3. The Project Coordinator, Tube-Well Department, Vishwaishwaraiya Bhawan, 4th Floor, Bailey Road, Patna

4. The Executive Engineer, Tube-Well Division, Bettiah, District- West Champaran

5. Laksha Grih Construction, Through Its Managing Director, Suresh Singh Son Of Late Pahwari Singh Resident Of Village Masan, P.O. & Police Station Yadopur, District- Gopalganj ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sachidanand Rai, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. Parth Sharthi, GA 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-12-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the decision of the resplendent no. 2 loaded on 09.11.2013 and also for quashing the letter no. 1629 dated 23.10.2013 issued under the signature of the respondent no. 2 for not opening the bid of the petitioner which was given against the work mentioned in Tender Notice no. 1/2013-14; for issuance of a direction to the respondents to open the bid given by the petitioner against the work mentioned against serial no. 1 to 3 in the light of circular dated 19.08.2013 issued by the Government of Bihar; for cancellation of agreement, if any, executed in favour of the respondent no. 5; and for connected reliefs.

Patna High Court CWJC No.23082 of 2013 dt.04-12-2018 2/2

2. Mr. Sachidanand Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and hence, it need not be pressed.

3. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed. BT/Chandran (Vikash Jain, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 05.12.2018 Transmission Date N.A.