Rupesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72534 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2023 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Rupesh Yadav S/o Bhageshwar Yadav R/o Village- Sahorwa, P.S.- Laukaha, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 120B and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Amar Yadav had moved this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 30753 of 2024 and the same was allowed by an order dated 21-09-2024, it is further submitted that while granting bail to Amar Yadav, the case was heard on merits and in detail. It is next submitted that as far as this petitioner is concerned, he along with Neeraj and Pankaj are alleged to have assaulted Rabindra by farsa.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that Pankaj had approached this court seeking

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72534 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 regular bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 27561 of 2024 and the same was dismissed by an order dated 21-09-2024 with a liberty to Pankaj to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. It is next submitted that the case of the petitioner, if not akin, is similar to that of Pankaj. It is further submitted that charges against the petitioner have been framed on 23-02-2024. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 83 of 2023.

7.

However, if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial court shall forthwith cancel his bail bonds after recording reasons. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T