← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1018/2014disposed

Vishwa Vijay Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-06Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1018 of 2014 ====================================================== Vishwa Vijay Singh Son Of Late Ram Dhyan Singh Resident Of MohallahEast Jagriti Nagar, Near Ashiyana Nursing Home, P.O.- B.V. College, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, Town & District- Patna (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Health, Government Of Bihar, Patna

4. The Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

5. The Principal Secretary, Labour Resource Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

6. The Under Secretary, General Administration Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

7. The Under Secretary, Department Of Health, Government Of Bihar, Patna

8. The Accountant General, Government Of Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Giri, Advocate, Mr. Sumit Kr.Jha, Advocate and Mr. Rajat Kr.Tiwary, Advocate For the State : Mr.Ashok Kumar Dubey, Advocate with Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, Advocate For the AG, Bihar : Mr. Ram Kinkar Chaubey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 06-07-2018 At the very outset, objection is raised by learned counsel for the State that issue involves withholding of 30% pension. The petitioner may avail remedy under Rule 24(2) of the Bihar CCA Rules, 2005.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner at some

Patna High Court CWJC No.1018 of 2014 (5) dt.06-07-2018 2/2 length, this Court observes that the petitioner should avail the remedy under Rule 24(2) of the Bihar CCA Rules. Since objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents, authorities would be obliged to consider the petitioner's review application on merit and pass speaking order in accordance with the law within a period eight weeks from the date of filing of the review application along with a copy of this order, if filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.

U