Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar Yadav @ Raju Kishore Kumar @ Raju Kishan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61120 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-363 Year-2019 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar Yadav @ Raju Kishore Kumar @ Raju Kishan, Son of Bodhu Yadav Resident of Village - Fulbigha, P.S.- Atri, Distt.- Gaya.

2.

Krishnna Yadav, Son of Late Nathun Yadav Resident of Village - Fulbigha, P.S.- Atri, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Atri P.S. Case No.363 of 2019, for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)(d) of Bihar Excise Prohibition Act, 2016.

The prosecution story is that police upon secret information raided the village Fulbigha and recovered a total quantity of 110 litres of illicit country-made Mahua liquor and some equipment for preparing illicit liquor near the Tarauni Tal. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and have falsely been implication merely on the basis of statement given by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61120 of 2019(2) dt.15-10-2019 2/2 Chowkidar and villagers. Learned counsel further submits that illicit liquor and equipment have not been recovered from the conscious possession or from the premises belonging to the petitioners.

Having regard to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the fact that no illicit liquor has been recovered from the conscious possession or the premises belonging to the petitioners and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to all these petitioners.

Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of surrender by them, they shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Court below upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Gaya, subject to the condition as mentioned under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U T