Ravi Raushan Kumar @ Ravi Raushan @ Barhan @ Bodhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61178 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2019 Thana- GHOSI DistrictJehanabad ====================================================== RAVI RAUSHAN KUMAR @ RAVI RAUSHAN @ BARHAN @ BODHAN Son of Shailendra Kumar Resident of Village- Charui @ Rampur Charui, P.S.- Ghosi in the District of Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 01-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307, 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Ghosi (Okari) P.S. Case No. 145 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mistaken identity and the specific statement is made in paragraph-8 of the petition that he is known as Ravi Raushan @ Ravi Raushan Kumar has never known by the name of Barhan whose name was overheard by the informant at the time of occurrence. It is further stated that Manish Kumar and the petitioner were well known to each other and it is improbable

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61178 of 2019(2) dt.01-10-2019 2/3 that the petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R. by his real name Ravi Raushan Kumar. The mobile number in the F.I.R. does not belong to the petitioner and in any event the injuries are simple in superficial in nature. It is submitted that except suspicion, there is no objective material to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-I, Jehanabad in connection with Ghosi (Okari) P.S. Case No. 145 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61178 of 2019(2) dt.01-10-2019 3/3 (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T