Ravi Kumar Gupta @ Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71265 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2024 Thana- KOTWALI District- Munger ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Gupta @ Ravi Kumar son of Late Mahadeo Prasad VillageShadipur, Ps- Kotwali Munger, Dist- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manendra Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kotwali (Munger) P.S. Case No. 176 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have abused the mother of the informant and tried to stop her from taking water. When mother of the informant resisted then he pushed her. It is also alleged that when one Dablu Yadav came to rescue the informant then the petitioner assaulted Dablu Yadav on his head with the butt of his pistol due to which he received injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71265 of 2024(2) dt.23-10-2024 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that both the parties are co-villagers and neighbours to each other and there is an admitted inimical terms between both the families and due to such cogent reasons the petitioner and his mother has been made accused in this case. The petitioner has seven criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the injured person has sustained grievous injury.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, nature of the injury and the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T