Guddu Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35176 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -136 Year- 2017 Thana -BARGANIA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Guddu Manjhi Son of Bindeshwar Manjhi, R/o Village- Begahi, P.S.- Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Pd.Singh,A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-08-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 272, 273, 353 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(A), 41, 37(C) of the Bihar Prohibition Excise Act. Allegation as per the F.I.R.is that the petitioner and other co-accused were apprehended and the petitioner was found in drunken condition. 36 liters of Nepali country made wine was recovered from possession of one of the co-accused Yuvraj Patel. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case having no criminal antecedent and he is in custody for more than two months.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35176 of 2017 (2) dt.04-08-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi, in connection with Bairgainia P.S. Case No.136 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No.2189/17 subjection to the conditions that (i) one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U T