Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68182/2025bail rejected

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-12Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68182 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1136 Year-2024 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Kumar S/O Laxmi Sah Resident of Village- Dadar, Kolhua, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur 2.

Manjeet Kumar @ Manjit Kumar S/O Laxmi Sah Resident of VillageDadar, Kolhua, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Manoj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 239(3), 109, 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per F.I.R., these petitioners assaulted informant and his family members with lathi and rod as a result of which they sustained injuries. During course of treatment, father of the informant died. Injury report of the informant and his mother confirms injury upon them with hard and blunt substances. Postmortem report of the deceased reveals presence of external

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68182 of 2025(3) dt.12-11-2025 2/2 injury upon him and cause of death is 'Shock and Hemorrhage' as a result of the aforesaid injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no specific accusation of overt act against these petitioners.

5. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the fact that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they along with other named accused persons assaulted informant and his family members, resulting in death of his father, prayer for anticipatory bail of these petitioners is refused.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T