Priyadarshani Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24382 of 2013 ====================================================== Priyadarshani Kumari Daughter Of Chandrakant Singh Resident Of Village + P.O.- Phuha, P.S.- Barhara, District- Bhojpur At Ara ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director Primary Education Department Of Human Resources Development Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Bhojpur At Ara

5. The District Development Commissioner, Bhojpur At Ara

6. The District Education Officer, Bhojpur At Ara

7. The Block Development Officer, Brahara, District- Bhojpur At Ara

8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Purvi Babura, Barhara, District- Bhojpur At Ara

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Purvi Babura, Barhara, DistrictBhojpur At Ara

10. The Bihar School Examination Board, Patna Through Its Secretary, Bihar, Patna

11. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Bihar, Patna

12. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, AC to SC-14 For the B.S.E.B.

:

Mr. Gyan Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 20-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as B.S.E.B.

Patna High Court CWJC No.24382 of 2013(4) dt.20-11-2018 2/2 The instant writ application requires so many factual inquiry which cannot be decided in the writ proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation addressed to the Secretary of the Bihar School Examination Board and the same is pending consideration and it has not been decided as yet. He prays that kindly issue direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the Secretary Bihar School Examination Board to address the grievance of the petitioner as set out in the representation contained in Annexure-4 series by taking speaking and reasoned order if not already disposed of within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U