Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68418/2023bail rejected

Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-18Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68418 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2023 Thana- DUMRAO District- Buxar ====================================================== Deepak Kumar S/O Jag Narayan Yadav @ Jag Narayan Singh R/O VillageJ.P. Dera Chaki, P.S.- Brahampur, Distt.- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mohit Shriwastava, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dumraon P.S. Case No. 94 of 2023 dated 27.02.2023, lodged under Section 392 of the I.P.C.

3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against three unknown accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the name of the petitioner has come in this case during investigation by virtue of the confessional statement of the co-accused. Counsel submits that the petitioner has been identified in the T.I.P.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68418 of 2023(2) dt.18-10-2023 2/2 that the petitioner is in custody since 20.03.2023 but remanded in the present case on 28.03.2023. Counsel further submits that there are in total seven criminal cases pending against the petitioner. In one case, he is on bail and in rest cases, he is persuading for bail.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner has been identified in the T.I.P. as mentioned in paragraph 85 of the case diary.

7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, therefore, his bail petition is hereby rejected.

8. However, liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail six months after framing of charge.

9. With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) sadique/- U T