Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36196 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2017 Thana -NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ======================================================
1. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Prasad, Son of Dashrath Mahto, resident of Village- Kahuara, Police Station- Nardiganj, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabi Bhushan Prasad No. 1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. This is a case registered for the offence under Sections-308, 494, 379 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in which, the petitioner apprehends arrest. The petitioner is said to be Bhainsur of the informant. There is no specific allegation of overt act against the petitioner. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 33 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36196 of 2017 (4) dt.24-01-2018 2/2 Magistrate, Nawada subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will liable to cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T