Sunny Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66051 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna ====================================================== Sunny Singh S/o- Ram Vilash Singh @ Vilash Singh R/o- Marcha PS - Bypass Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akash Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(1), 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 125, 132, 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. It is further submitted that co-accused, namely, Mithilesh Singh @ Mithalesh Singh @ Malha @ Malha Singh had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 53303 of 2025 and the same was allowed by an order dated 18.08.2025. It is next submitted that the case of the petitioner is similar to the case of Mithilesh Singh @ Mithalesh Singh @ Malha @ Malha Singh and, thus, based on parity seeks anticipatory bail. It is also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66051 of 2025(2) dt.12-09-2025 2/3 submitted that the informant alleges that informant along with police force had gone to inspect the site for Holika Dahan when the accused persons 32 in numbers came and attacked the force and pelted stones causing injury to the police officials.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault and pelting stones is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66051 of 2025(2) dt.12-09-2025 3/3

7. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, namely, Ram Vilash Singh @ Vilash Singh.

8. However, if the investigating officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner, despite giving assurance to this Court, is not cooperating in the investigation, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T