Madhavi Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10552 of 2017 ====================================================== Madhavi Devi wife of Sri Anand Prasad Keshri, resident of VillageKauriram, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabhua). 2.
The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, BSFC Bhawan, Daroga Rai, Path, Patna through its Managing Director. 3.
The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, BSFC Bhawan, Daroga Rai Path, Patna 4.
The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Kaimur (Bhabhua).
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.S. Raza Ahmad- AAG 5 Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 11-11-2020 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "For quashing of a notice-cumletter no. 531 dated 18.3.2017 issued by the District Manager (Respondent no.4) as contained in Annexure-4 by which he has asked the petitioner to furnish Bank Guarantee for amount of Rs. 2,01,47,590/- paise in the light of the direction given by the Supreme Court in S.L.P. (Cr.) No.1779 of 2016 and/or for issuance of writ/writs,
Patna High Court CWJC No.10552 of 2017 dt.11-11-2020 2/3 direction/directions as your lordships may deem fit and proper."
Learned counsel for the petitioner invites our attention to the intervening developments which have taken place, post filing of the instant petition.
According to learned counsel, Hon'ble Apex Court, with respect to the very same subject matter, in relation to similarly situated persons, has already expressed its views in the decision reported in (2018) 8 SCC 475 titled as Arvind Tiwary Vs. State of Bihar and another as also M.A. No. 1140 of 2019 arising out of Cr. Appeal No. 998 of 2018 titled as Arvind Tiwary Vs. State of Bihar and another.
On the other hand, Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, clarifies that there are other orders passed by Hon'ble the Apex Court. In view of the intervening developments, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition can be disposed of reserving liberty to the writ-petitioner to invite attention of the authorities of the passing of the orders by the Hon'ble Apex Court, referred to supra and its applicability to the petitioner's case.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10552 of 2017 dt.11-11-2020 3/3 The request of the petitioner, in pursuing alternative remedies before an appropriate forum is not opposed by the respondents, and rightly so.
As such, as prayed for, the present petition is disposed of as not pursued any further.
We have not expressed any opinion on merits, leaving it open for the parties to agitate the issue if so required and desired.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) DKS/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date