Tilkeshwar Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66171 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2022 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Tilkeshwar Roy Son Of Sobhakant Ray R/O Village- Kalapatti Barhi, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 12.06.2022 in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 141 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 05.06.2022 for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

According to prosecution case, four miscreants arrived on two motorcycle and surrounded the informant and his family members and on the point of pistol they snatched the key of his motorcycle and fled away.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66171 of 2022(4) dt.10-05-2023 2/3 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the information given by the spy and the self confessional statement of the petitioner. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession or the house of the petitioner and and till date no T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 12.06.2022.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries 3 criminal antecedents other than the present one.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 141 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66171 of 2022(4) dt.10-05-2023 3/3

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T