← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1001/2018dismissed

Prafull Chand Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

2018-07-18Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.1001 of 2018 (2) dt.18-07-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1001 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17460 of 2016 ====================================================== Prafull Chand Singh, Son of Late Hari Narayan Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. Manikpur, P.S.- Dhansoi, District- Buxar, presently working as Accounts Clerk in the office of Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Sasaram.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Chanchal Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Upendra Narayn, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as Chief Engineer (South), Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Ramdayalu Yadav, son of not known to the petitioner, the then Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Circle, Ara.

5. Sri Raghunandan Sharan, son of not known to the petitioner, Presently posted as Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Sasaram .

6. Sri Vikrama Prasad, son of not known to the petitioner, Presently posted as Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Buxar.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Adv. Ms. Anita Kumari, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Prasad Yadav, AAG- 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 18-07-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

The parties are in agreement that the order passed on the writ petition has been complied.

The contempt application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/Anjula U