Krishna Prasad Srivastava @ Krishna Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69215 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-473 Year-2023 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Krishna Prasad Srivastava @ Krishna Prasad Son Of Late Chandrika Prasad, Resident Of Village - Chilabhar Chaita, Ward No. 4, Police Station - Majhaulia, District- West Champaran.

2.

Chitranjan Srivastav @ Deep Narayan Srivastav, Son Of Krishna Prasad Srivastav @ Krishna Prasad, Resident Of Village - Chilabhar Chaita, Ward No. 4, Police Station - Majhaulia, District- West Champaran. 3.

Sudha Devi @ Sudha Srivastav, Wife Of Chitranjan Srivastav @ Deep Narayan Srivastav, Resident Of Village - Chilabhar Chaita, Ward No. 4, Police Station - Majhaulia, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Kishun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections304 (B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioners are the in-law and family member of the husband of the deceased. He submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69215 of 2023(3) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 the husband of the deceased is in judicial custody. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 473 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T