Ravindra Parhia @ Sunil Parhia @ Bhola Parhia v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71852 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2011 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Ravindra Parhia @ Sunil Parhia @ Bhola Parhia Son Of Muni Parahiya@Munni Parahiya @ Munni Parhia Resident Of Village- Dumhiya, Ps- Raushanganj, Bankeybazar, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 365 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act and Sections 13, 16, 18, 20 of the U.A.P. Act.
3. As per prosecution case, 23 named accused persons including the petitioner herein and 50-60 unknown persons belonging to the M.C.C. Group are stated to have kidnapped
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71852 of 2023(3) dt.07-02-2024 2/3 three villagers. It is stated that subsequently the JCB machine etc. being used in construction of bridge etc, were put on fire.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and no specific overt act against him. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence in any manner and he was not present at the place of occurrence. He further submitted that the other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide orders dated 05.12.2020/12.10.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 20572 of 2020 and 53991 of 2022. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 13.07.2023.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71852 of 2023(3) dt.07-02-2024 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Raushanganj P.S. Case No. 59 of 2011.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T