← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2319/2022disposed

Nijamuddin Ali v. Union Of India

2024-03-15Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2319 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6066 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Nijamuddin Ali, Son of Majid Miya Resident of Village- Siswaniya, P.S.- Thakaraha, District- West Champaran.

2.

Chandrama Sharma, Son of Chhathu Sharma Resident of VillageThakaraha, P.S.- Thakaraha, District- West Champaran. 3.

Vijay Kumar Son of Lalan Chaudhary Resident of Village- Malahi Tola, P.S.- Thakaraha, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways.

2.

Alka Upadhyay, The Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. 3.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

4.

Amir Subhani, The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

5.

Vikash Vaibhav, The Additional Secretary, Government of Bihar. 6.

Pratyay Amrit, The Principal Secretary, Bridge Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7.

Pankaj Kumar The Divisional Commissioner, (Tirhut) West Champaran. 8.

Kundan Kumar, The District Magistrate, West Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surya Narayan Sah For O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 :

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Sr. CGC Mr. Arvind Kumar, CGC For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Additional Solicitor General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 15-03-2024 Learned counsels for the parties, on instruction, submitted that orders of this Court has been complied.

Patna High Court MJC No.2319 of 2022(4) dt.15-03-2024 2/2

2. Perusal of the records, it is evident that there is belated compliance. However, the concerned authority is hereby directed to take note of that orders of the Court should be complied within a time limit. The same shall be taken note of for future reference.

3. Accordingly, the present M.J.C- Contempt Petition stands dropped.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) manish/- U