Surendra Kumar Sahni Alias Surendra Kumar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15518 of 2023 ====================================================== Surendra Kumar Sahni alias Surendra Kumar Sahani Son of Late Damodar Sahani, Resident of Ward No. 6, Village- Chandpura, Rajaura, P.OChandpura, P.S.- Nima Chandpura, District- Begusarai, Bihar- 851131. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Block Supply Officer, Chandpura, Begusarai. 3.

The Sub-Divisional Public Grievance Redressal, Begusarai. 4.

The District Magistrate cum Second Appellate Authority, Public Grievance, Begusarai.

5.

First Appellate Authority cum Sub Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Begusarai.

6.

Shankar Sah, S/o Late Dhanik Sah Village and P.S.- Nima Chandpura, Dist.- Begusarai, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manu Tripurari, Advocate Mr. Apurv Harsh, Advocate Mr. Raghu Raj Pratap, Advocate Mr. Almanya, Advocate Mr. Hritik, Advocate Mr. Astitva, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S. Raza Ahmad (Aag5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 23-07-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.(i) Issuance of a writ of certiorari or writs in the nature thereof or any other appropriate writs/orders/directions for quashing of order dated 24/09/2022 passed in second appeal no.

42011- 21127 by Respondent No. 4.

Patna High Court CWJC No.15518 of 2023(4) dt.23-07-2024 2/2 (ii) Issuance of a writ of mandamus or writs in the nature thereof or any other appropriate writ/order/directions for cancelling the license having no. 89/2016 of Respondent No. 6 [old license no. 116/2007], subsequent to his conviction in Nima Chandpur P.S. Case No. 52/07 (S.T no. 71/2009), as per the mandate of law."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U