Jeetendra Singh @ Jitendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61654 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-527 Year-2019 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
JEETENDRA SINGH @ JITENDRA SINGH Son of Late Ram Bhajan Singh Resident of Village - Darigaon, P.S.- Darigaon, Sasaram (T), Distt. - Rohtas.
2.
Anjan Devi @ Anjan Kumari Wife of Jitendra Singh @ Jeetendra Singh Resident of Village - Darigaon, P.S.- Darigaon, Sasaram (T), Distt. - Rohtas. 3.
Mangal Singh Son of Late Harihar Singh Resident of Village - Darigaon, P.S.- Darigaon, Sasaram (T), Distt. - Rohtas. 4.
Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Rajesh Singh Son of Bishani Singh @ Vishun Singh Resident of Village - Mahdiganj, P.S.- Sasaram (Muf)., Distt. - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 01-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 379, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S. Case No. 527/2019.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties, who are agnates. The present FIR has been instituted in retaliation to the earlier FIR in Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S. Case No. 526/2018. It is submitted that in any event the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners' be each
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61654 of 2019(2) dt.01-10-2019 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Sasaram, Rohtas, in connection with Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S. Case No. 527/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and the petitioner no. 2 shall be well represented in Court on each and every date during trial except as and when directed by the learned Court below to be physically present, and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T