Jitendra Sah v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.191 of 2018 ====================================================== Jitendra Sah, Son of Guru Dayal Sah, Resident of Village- Runni Saidpur, P.S.- Runni Saidpur, District- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Patna.

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi.

5. The Sub-Inspector, Excise Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

6. The SHO Majorganj Police Station, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad (Gp-7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 2.

16-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner has prayed for release of the vehicle (Hero HF Delux) bearing registration no. BR30M-9752 in favour of the petitioner in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 184 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this Court for provisional release of the vehicle in question. In the facts and circumstances, pending initiation or finalization of the confiscation proceeding, let the vehicle, if belongs to the petitioner, be released provisionally on production of proof of ownership and

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.191 of 2018 (2) dt.16-03-2018 registration of the vehicle in his favour subject to the following conditions:- (i) Petitioner shall furnish a surety bond of Rs. 60,000/- (Sixty Thousand only) in form of Bank guarantee or the original title deed of an immovable property lying within the jurisdiction of the court or any other security of like nature to the satisfaction of the learned Court below or the Collector cum District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, as the case may be.

(ii) Petitioner shall furnish an undertaking that he would not alienate or encumber the vehicle or deal with them adverse to the interest of the State and shall produce the vehicle before the court below and/or the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, as and when directed.

(iii) A photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and panchnama be also prepared, certified and be kept on record in accordance with law.

This application is, accordingly, disposed off. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U T