← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67037/2025bail granted

Ranjit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-24Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67037 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Ranjit Kumar Singh Son of Late Anirudh Singh Resident of VillageKewadhi, Ward no. 7, P.S.- Kudra, District- Rohtas, State- Bihar 2.

Devendra Ram Son of Mudrika Ram Resident of Village- Basdiha, PsKaragahar, Dist- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) & 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the allegation in the FIR, total 88.200 litres of foreign liquor has been recovered inside an Alto Car from the possession of the petitioners bearing Registration No. UP25M6554.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67037 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioners. He further submits that there is no independent eye witness of the seizure list. He next submits that petitioners are in judicial custody since 17.08.2025. He fairly submits that petitioner no.1 has got four criminal antecedents and petitioner no.2 has got two criminal antecedents and they are on bail in all the cases as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, let the above named petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-I, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Rohtas Excise Case No.676 of 2025 and Sasaram Excise P.S. Case No. 286 of 2025 with a condition that the petitioners shall remain physically present on each and every dated fixed by the learned Trial Court till conclusion of the trial. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T