Patna High CourtCWJC/18496/2013disposed

Savita Devi v. Santosh Kumar Maurya And ORS

2016-07-14Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18496 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Savita Devi W/O Santosh Kumar Maurya, D/O Ram Ashish Singh Bhrigu Ashram Shastri Park, Balia District - Balia, U.P. Present Address Fazalganj, Sasaram District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Santosh Kumar Maurya S/O Prashuram Maurya R/O Mohalla - Bhrigu Ashram, Shashtri Park, Bahia, P.S. - Balia, District - Balia, Uttar Pradesh

2. The State Of Uttar Pradesh through the Chief Secretary, Govt. Of U.P., Lucknow

3. The District Magistrate, Aajamgarh

4. The District Magistrate, Balia

5. The Principal Finance Secretary, Uttar Pradesh

6. The Director General of Police, Lucknow

7. The Superintendent Of Police, Azamgarh

8. The Superintendent Of Police, Balia

9. The D.I.G., Azamgarh

10. The I.G. Varanasi, U.P.

11. The Commissioner, Lucknow

12. The Principal Secretary, Lucknow

13. The Section Officer, Accounts, Azamgarh

14. Prashuram Maurya Father of The Santosh Kumar Maurya Bhrigu Ashram, Balia, Uttar Pradesh .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kr Sharan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 14-07-2016 Mr. Alam, counsel for the petitioner, after making submissions at some length, has fairly submitted that the petitioner shall move the learned Family Court for initiating contempt proceeding in accordance with law against the respondent (husband) who in spite of diverse orders passed by the Court in the pending proceeding bearing Maintenance case No. 4 of 2005 and

Patna High Court CWJC No.18496 of 2013 (4) dt.14-07-2016 2/2 the Misc. case no. 29 of 2006, arising therefrom, has not complied with the orders of the Court.

The writ application stands disposed of permitting the petitioner to approach the learned Family Court where the maintenance matter and connected matter(s), are pending consideration.

Needless to observe, if any application is filed by the petitioner, the learned Family Court, in seisin of the matter, shall take decision and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U