Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16821 of 2023 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Singh Son of Late Ram Naresh Singh, resident of Baniya Baraun, P.S. Sherghati, District - Gaya, presently posted as Panchayat Sevak within Block - Bodh - Gaya, District - Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate, Gaya.
3.
The Block Development Officer, Neemchak Bathani, District - Gaya. 4.
The Block Development Officer, Nagar (Town), Gaya. 5.
The Block Development Officer, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya. 6.
The Block Development Officer, Koach, District - Gaya. 7.
The Block Development Officer, Guraru District - Gaya. 8.
The Block Development Officer, Belaganj, District - Gaya. 9.
The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Gaya.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Kameshwar Prasad Gupta ( Gp 10 ) Mr. Satya Vrat, AC to GP-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1 That in the present writ application petitioner prays before this Hon'ble Court to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents particularly respondent no.3 and respondent no 5 to pay the arrear of salaries which has been withheld w.e.f. June 2011. Further prayer of petitioner
Patna High Court CWJC No.16821 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2024 2/2 to pay the regular salary after including the 1st A.C.P. and 2nd A.C.P. as the petitioner is starving due to non- payment of salary to him. Further the petitioner prays to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no 3 Block Development officer, Neemchak Bathani to forward the last pay certificate to respondents which has been withheld by respondent no.3 since 2011."
2.
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U