Gulshan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66146 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2024 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== Gulshan Paswan Son of Late Nilesh Paswan R/O Village- Bela, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Adv.

Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)(a) of the Arms Act, 1959.

3. As per F.I.R., the father of informant has transferred 15 decimals of land in favour of informant through a sale deed and due to that reason, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner, who are Pattidars of informant's father, took possession of the aforesaid land in connivance with each other and whenever, informant went for cultivating the land, they used to assault her. It is further alleged that on 21.7.2024, the accused persons scuffled with informant and thereafter, this petitioner took out his revolver and started giving threatening to informant's husband, but his revolver was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66146 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/2 snatched by co-villagers, and same was handed over to the Chawkidar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly, there is land dispute between the parties and due to this, petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no recovery of any fire-arm from conscious possession of this petitioner and as such, no case under the Arms Act is made out against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 284 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T