← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/836/2018disposed

Akhilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-31Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.836 of 2018 ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar, Son of Bhogendra Thakur, resident of Village- Panapur Bateshwar Nath, Post Office- Dandhua, District- Vaishali, presently posted as Assistant Teacher, Primary School, Pahetiya (West), Village- Pahetia, Post Office- Dharhara, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Education Officer-cum- Chairman, District Elementary Teacher Promotion Committee, Vaishali.

5. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), District- Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. SMT. SHILPA SINGH- GA12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 31-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that writ petition is covered by the decision of this court contained in Annexure-5 dated 4.9.2015 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14075 of 2015. In view of the order contained in Annexure-5 the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent, District Programme Officer (Establishment), Vaishali (respondent no.5) who shall examine the case of the petitioner in the light of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14075 of 2015 and take decision within a period of sixty days from the date of filing of such

Patna High Court CWJC No.836 of 2018(2) dt.31-01-2018 2/2 representation alongiwth a copy of this order. In case, the respondent finds the case of the petitioner similar to the petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 14075 of 2015, similar benefit should be extended to this petitioner also. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U