Arpan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72507 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2023 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui ====================================================== Arpan Paswan S/O Rajdeo Paswan R/O Village- Raychor,Tola Bhowa, P.S.- Chandramandih, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra Mr. Atul Kumar, Mr. Dhandav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 354A, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place and the petitioner is nephew of the informant and is alleged to have assaulted the son of the informant, Yashwant Paswan, by a sharp edged weapon causing injury on his head, further Rahul and Putul are alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72507 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 to have caught Yashwant; and the petitioner assaulted him. 4.

It is next submitted that from perusal of the injury report, it would manifest that two injuries were found to be simple but then injury on head is opined to be grievous. It is also submitted that during course of investigation, it transpired that Rahul and Putul were not present at the place of occurrence. The learned counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 3-7-2024 and is not a criminal and on account of dispute in the family, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place and the blow was not repeated.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chandramandih P.S. Case No. 206 of 2023.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T