Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1026 of 2018 ====================================================== Ajit Kumar, S/o Shambhu Rai, resident of Village- Pahleja Shahpur Diyara, P.S.- Sonpur, District- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate-cum- Collector, Saran at Chapra.
4. The Officer-in- Charge, Sonpur Police Station, Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Vivek Prasad -GP 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 24-01-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (TVS Victor Motorcycle) bearing Registration No. BR04V3625, which has been seized in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 286 of 2017 due to violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case, vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.
Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case,
Patna High Court CWJC No.1026 of 2018(2) dt.24-01-2018 2/2 the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing two sureties to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra within a period of one week from the date of his furnishing the sureties and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case so as to cause adverse effect or prejudice to the State Government.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- U