Binod Kumar v. That State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16473 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.
Binod Kumar Son of Late Jangli Mistri Resident of Villate- Chhoti Badalpura P.S.- Khagaul District- Patna.
2.
Dilip Kumar Son of Surya Dayal Prasad Resident of Village- Dariyapur Mainpur, P.S.-Phulwarisharif, District-Patna. 3.
Raj Kishore Sharma Son of Late Yadu Sharma Resident of Mohalla-Shri Ram Path, Patel Nagar, P.S.-Shastri Nagar District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
That State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Chairman, State Level Committee for Wood-Based Industries, BiharCum-Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Licensing Officer-Cum-Divisional Forest Officer, Patna Forest Division, Patna.
5.
Geeta Devi Wife of Late Shashi Bhushan Prasad Resident of MohallaBuddha Colony, P.S.-Buddha Colony, District-Patna. 6.
Jasveer Singh Son of Sardar Mahendra Singh Resident of MohallaKankarbagh, P.S.-Kankarbagh, District-Patna. 7.
Arun Kumar Sinha Son of Kailash Sinha Resident of Mohalla-Gabhtal, P.S.- Danapur, District-Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinay Mistry, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Raghwanand, GA 11 Mr. AC to GA 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to move before the Respondent No. 2, the Chairman,
Patna High Court CWJC No.16473 of 2024(2) dt.16-01-2025 2/2 State Level Committee for Wood Based Industries, Bihar-cumPrincipal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, Patna. If the petitioners files a detailed representation alongwith all the relevant documents within a period of four weeks' before the Respondent No. 2, then the Respondent No. 2 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners and pass a reasoned and speaking order after hearing the Respondent Nos. 5, 6 & 7 of the present writ application within a period of twelve weeks' in accordance with law.
3. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U