Sanjay Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67208 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2022 Thana- GARHI District- Jamui ====================================================== SANJAY RAVIDAS Son of Late Prayag Ravidas R/v- Mudwaro, P.S. Garhi, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Najmul Hodda, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. H.A. Khan, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

A supplementary affidavit was filed by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Let it be kept on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to correct the paragraph no.3 of the bail petition in course of the day. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, petitioner along with other co-accused persons tortured the informant and his husband and ordered them to leave the house. They threatened them of bad consequences. Due to pressure, husband of informant committed suicide by hanging himself.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67208 of 2022(2) dt.19-01-2023 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Both the parties are co-villagers. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is totally wrong and baseless. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that he has no concern with the family affairs of the informant and it is totally false to say that the petitioner and other co-accused have abated in the commitment of his suicide. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances, since there is allegation of abatement to commit suicide, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T