Patna High CourtCWJC/22703/2013disposed

Masroor Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-07Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22703 of 2013 ====================================================== Masroor Ahmad, Son of Late Islamul Haque, Head of the Department of Sociology, Rural Institute Higher Education, Birauli, Police Station- Pusa, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Secretary, Department of Human Resources & Development (Higher Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

5. The Rural Institute (Birauli) Society, a Society Registered Under the Societies Registration Act 1860, having its Registered Office At Birauli, P.S. Pusa, District- Samastipur through its Secretary

6. The Director, Higher Education, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Najmul Hoda, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 Mr. Arbind Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 07-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

2. The issue raised in the present writ application stands concluded by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 83 of 2016.

3. In C.W.J.C. No. 5651 of 2012, the writ Court allowed the enhancement of age of Institute employees from 62 to 65 years. That matter was taken to L.P.A. Court in L.P.A. No. 83 of 2016.

Patna High Court CWJC No.22703 of 2013(5) dt.07-12-2018 2/2

4. On consideration of the entire facts and circumstances, L.P.A. Court quashed the order passed by the writ Court in C.W.J.C. No. 5651 of 2012 and in view of the judgment of the L.P.A. Court, the writ application does not merit any consideration.

5. Accordingly, the writ application stands dismissed. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U