← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44616/2012dismissed

Someshwar Singh And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-07-06Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44616 of 2012 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2004 Thana East Champaran (Motihari) Muffasil DistrictEAST CHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) =========================================================== 1.

Someshwar Singh, son of Shri Chandeshwar Singh, resident of village Jhakhara, P.S. Piprakothi, Distt. East Champaran. 2.

Meratun Nesha, wife of late Idrish Sah, resident of village Suryapur, P.S. Piprakothi, Distt. East Champaran.

3.

Shanker Das, son of Banarshi Das, resident of village Girhwa, P.S. Mufasssil, Distt. East Champaran, Motihari.

4.

Shambhu Prasad, son of Baiju Prasad, resident of village at Dharm Samaj Road, P.S. Nagar (Town), Distt. East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

Bhola Sah, son of Ayodhya Sah, resident of village Chand Saraiya, P.S. Pipra Kothi, Distt. East Champaran, Motihari. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rakesh Ranjan, Supply Inspector, Motihari Sadar, East Champaran, Motihari.

.... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Usha Rai, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Nityanand, A.P.P. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State. The Petitioners seek quashing of the order of cognizance dated 1.4.2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Motihari, in East Champaran (Motihari) Muffassil P.S. Case No. 183 of 2004 (Tr. No. 2898 of 2012) on the ground that in the facts of the case, no offence is made out.

However, on looking at the contents of the case diary, this Court does not accept said submission.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44616 of 2012 dt.06-07-2015 2/2 Hence, the application is dismissed.

The Trial Court is directed to conclude the Trial expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party for which reason, he is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order in connection with East Champaran (Motihari) Muffassil P.S. Case No. 183 of 2004 (Tr. No. 2898 of 2012), to the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari, and the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari, is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. (Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T