← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69739/2024bail granted

Babloo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-13Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69739 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2023 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Babloo Yadav S/o- Ramaotar Yadav Resident of Village- Alauli PS- Alauli District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 25(1-b)a, 26(i), 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant with allegation that petitioner fired but then no one was injured in the firing. It is next submitted that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot, rather co-accused Rohit was apprehended from whose possession pistol was found. It is next submitted that petitioner is in custody since 31.07.2024 and charge sheet has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69739 of 2024(2) dt.13-12-2024 2/2 submitted as such no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in jail.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 147 of 2023.

6. However, it is made clear that if the learned Trial Court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner in that event the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner forthwith after recording reasons. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T